24/7 Homework Help

Studykind Will Help You Write Your Essays and Term Papers

From initial topic to finished paper

Question:

Discussion: Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Week 8

by | Jun 5, 2022 | fresh

To prepare for this Discussion:

By Day 5 of Week 7, your Instructor will have assigned you a neurocognitive disorder, which will be the focus for your initial post for this Discussion.

  
Assigned Disorder:  Vascular Neurocognitive Disorder

Post:

Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned neurocognitive disorder.

Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned neurocognitive disorder.

Identify the risks of different types of therapy and explain how the benefits of the therapy that might be achieved might outweigh the risks.

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years In APA Format Including an introduction and conclusion

1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 1/4

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

  OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance

Competent
Performance

Pro�cient
Performance

Room for
Improvement

Main
Posting:
Response to
the
discusion
question is
re�ecive
with critical
analysis and
synthesis
representive
of knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for
the module
and current
credible
sources.

44 (44%) – 44
(44%)

* Thoroughly
responds to the
discusion
question(s) *is
re�ecive with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representive of
knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources. *
supported by at
least 3 current,
credible
sources

40 (40%) – 43
(43%)

* Responds to
the discusion
question(s) *is
re�ecive with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representive of
knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for the
module. * 75%
of post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth *
supported by at
least 3 credible
references

35 (35%) – 39
(39%)

* Responds to
most of the
discusion
question(s) *is
somewhat
re�ecive with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representive of
knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for the
module. * 50%
of post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth *
supported by at
least 3 credible
references

31 (31%) – 34
(34%)

* Responds to
some of the
discusion
question(s) *
one to two
criteria are not
addressed or
are
super�cially
addresed *is
somewhat
lacking
re�ection and
critical analysis
and synthesis
*somewhat
represents
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for
the module. *
post is cited
with fewer than
2 credible
references

0 (0%) – 30
(30%)

* Does not
respond to
the discusion
question(s) *
lacks depth or
super�cially
addresses
criteria *lacks
re�ection and
critical
analysis and
synthesis
*does not
represent
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for
the module. *
contains only
1 or no
credible
references

Name: NRNP_6670_Week8_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 2/4

  OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance

Competent
Performance

Pro�cient
Performance

Room for
Improvement

Main
Posting:
Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Written
clearly and
concisely *
Contains no
grammatical or
spelling errors
* Fully adheres
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)

* Written
clearly and
concisely * May
contain one or
no grammatical
or spelling
error * Adheres
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Written
concisely * May
contain one to
two
grammatical or
spelling error *
Adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style

4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
*Writtten
somewhat
concisely * May
contain more
than two2
spelling or
grammatical
errors *
Contains some
APA formatting
erros

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Not written
clearly or
concisely *
Contains
more than
two spelling
or
grammatical
errors * Does
not adhere to
current APA
manual
writing rules
and style

Main
Posting:
Timely and
full
participation

10 (10%) – 10
(10%)

* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts main
discussion by
due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation

First
Reponse
Post to
colleague’s
main post
that is
re�ective
and justi�ed
with credible
sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings *
responds to
questions
posed by
faculty * the
use of scholarly
sources to
support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5
(8.5%)

* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8
(8%)

* response has
some depth
and may
exhibit critical
thinking or
application to
practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7
(7%)

* response is
on topic, may
have some
depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse
may not be on
topic, lacks
depth

1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 3/4

  OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance

Competent
Performance

Pro�cient
Performance

Room for
Improvement

First
Reponse:
Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
fully answered
if posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)

*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
answered if
posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
*
Communication
is mostly
professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
mostly
answered if
posed *
Provides
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
few credible
sources *
Response is
written in
Standard
Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5
(4.5%)

* Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack e�ective
professional
communication
* Response to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered if
posed * Few or
no credible
sources are
cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion
lack e�ective
* Response to
faculty
questions are
missing * No
credible
sources are
cited

First
Reponse:
Timely and
full
participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts by due
date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation

Second
Reponse:
Post to
colleague’s
main post
that is
re�ective
and justi�ed
with credible
sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings *
responds to
questions
posed by
faculty * the
use of scholarly
sources to
support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5
(8.5%)

* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8
(8%)

* response has
some depth
and may
exhibit critical
thinking or
application to
practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7
(7%)

* response is
on topic, may
have some
depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse
may not be on
topic, lacks
depth

1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 4/4

  OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance

Competent
Performance

Pro�cient
Performance

Room for
Improvement

Second
Reponse:
Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
fully answered
if posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)

*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
answered if
posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
*
Communication
is mostly
professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
mostly
answered if
posed *
Provides
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
few credible
sources *
Response is
written in
Standard
Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5
(4.5%)

* Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack e�ective
professional
communication
* Response to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered if
posed * Few or
no credible
sources are
cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion
lack e�ective
* Response to
faculty
questions are
missing * No
credible
sources are
cited

Second
Reponse:
Timely and
full
participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts by due
date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6670_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT

HOME TO CERTIFIED WRITERS

Why Place An Order With Us?

  • Certified Editors
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Profesional Research
  • Easy to Use System Interface
  • Student Friendly Pricing

Have a similar question?

Services that we offer

Your Paper Is In Safe Hands

PLAGIRAISM FREE PAPERS

All papers we provide are well-researched, properly formatted and cited.

TOP QUALITY

All papers we provide are well-researched, properly formatted and cited.

HIGHLY SECURED

All papers we provide are well-researched, properly formatted and cited.

Related Assignments

Study more efficiently

Quickly get your essay from idea to final graft save time, money and effort.

Boost your grade

Get through your toughest problem and learn how to solve them from expert writers

Essay Writing Service Ready to Help Online 24/7

Hire a professional just from $9.99

Click here

Chat now
1
Powered by Studykind
Hello! Welcome to to our whatapp support.

We offer READY solutions, HIGH QUALITY PLAGIARISM FREE essays and term-papers.

We are online and ready to help.